LANDSCAPE CARE
Here you should speak to the experts, but let’s make some points clear:
1) The landscape must be protected, but this should not be done by preventing the owners of the land from occupying and thriving on it.
2) Rural planning control (or the citizen) should not be overreasnified by the point of turning the property into an unbearable burden on the owner. “Democracies” accuse communism of excessive control over property or the absence of private property. Is there really private property when the state can forcibly expropriate? It should be the factors of convenience to the Common Good, that encourage owners to cede or sell land to the state, but not by forced impositions. We live under a moneycratic government, with market laws that prevail over work, goods and services. Why should we endure the contradiction of having the property under a “communist” regime in which the state has more rights than the owner? If the State is going to tell us what we can and cannot do with our properties, that also assures us vocational work and livelihood, that ensures free of charge our education and that of our children, that guarantees a health and disaster prevention system as efficient as the Cuban, that eliminates advertising from television and public roads… Do we live in a democracy or in communism? It is supposed to be in a democracy, but only to elect representatives, because in reality the regime is called Mercado. But judging by urban laws, the capitalist state is really and in the worst sense communist. Neither democracy nor communism may be bad per se, once legislative powers and usury are taken away, but the mixture of legal criteria of application produces harmful contradictions, with serious economic harm to all.
3) The styles, colors and other aesthetic aspects of the construction, may and should be suggested by architects and landscape engineers, but should never be imposed with force of law, neither national, nor autonomous community or province nor by municipalities. Regulations must in any case be arising by consensus, by referendum of citizens, of the neighbours in each village.
4) The landscape should have improvements and care as a product of education not of legal repression or of preventing its habitability.
5) Just as many States currently impose prohibitions on rural owners, dictate as if they own constructive and aesthetic guidelines, they are very well kept from talking about wiring, roads and bridges, industrial parks, reservoirs, works and transformations that they inaugurate with drums and cymbals, often against the wishes of the inhabitants and even to their direct harm.
6) At the moment, millions of owners around the world are unable to sell or honestly use their properties because a high-voltage line passes over them or there are road construction plans. It is difficult to be against these “improvements” when they really are, but the State does not give quick solutions to the economic damage of the individuals concerned, who after an expropriation take years to collect miseries of compensation, even if the Law (not understandable to the common citizen) contemplates to some extent their defence. The worst thing is that there is a total misinformation to the owners about these plans, knowing them already about the time of the start of the works. This harms homeowners, prospective buyers and real estate agents.
An area where “a new road may pass” becomes an economically dead zone, sometimes for decades, since the plan is known but the layout is not known. Until agreements with road companies are finalised, geological confirmation studies are done and works begin, many years pass and those affected are in unfair uncertainty about the fate of their properties. Speculators well-informed by the few connoisseurs of these plots, do their business with the detriment of many. Finally, a property that could not be used because ecological, landscape, urbanistic or simple “absence of plans” protections forbade it, has become a road, with all its pollution, its noise and goodbye landscape.
7) A forest burned for lack of care, thanks to the impossibility of being inhabited by its owners, is a landscape to mourn. A landscape of abandoned terraces because only the owner is allowed to make a “house of tools” and cannot live there to enjoy his countryside, it is also something very sad and economically detrimental to the affected, to the Community and to the State.
8) If you want to take care of the landscape for a better tourist industry, it should be noted that hikers are not a very important percentage in tourism, but even they are looking for rural houses and campsites to stay in. Those who want to isolate themselves from civilization and not see a house, go to the Amazon rainforest, to the Sahara or elsewhere. Even with a good demographic distribution and soil liberalization, there will be no shortage of walking places, mountains to climb and forests to hide in. What will be achieved will be less forest fires and less destruction of historical and archaeological value, because their owners will be there to take care of them.
PROTECTION OF FLORA AND FAUNA
1.- The first species to be preserved from extinction and all possible damage, is ours: Human. This requires both the care of the ecological environment and living conditions in the legal framework. Without a well-understood application of Ecology, there is no ecology possible. Environmentalists are intelligent and altruistic activists, but most organizations are infiltrated to keep them entertained in saving animal species, not realizing that the real danger lies in demographics. Without healthy and intelligent control of human birth and using resources under market interest, we will extinguish everything, even the animals that are intended to protect.
2.- The protection of species should be done respecting private property, on the basis of education, not repression, and through fair purchase, not through forced expropriation, which generates poles of resistance in the middle-high classes that have the greatest amount of large land. We look forward to the collaboration of the true environmentalists who cleverly propose real solutions, that is, those that for reason and justice conform to all the criteria and interests in each country and region.
INDUSTRY AND ECOLOGY
Today there is no lack of technology to make Earth a Paradise. The problem is, on the one hand, enormous mediocrity in political sectors and on the other hand something contrary to mediocrity, but equally appalling: The pride of power.
Knowing that higher-elite technologists tend to serve the war industry with preference (for lack of scruples and economic ambition) but that many are also hardened “experimenters,” who are not afraid of experiments that could destroy the world or the entire universe, it is difficult for societies to want to be left at the mercy of a “technocracy.” But what is being urgent is that technologists with ethics, common sense and respect for humanity begin to occupy the positions now held by their colleagues with less social conscience. And encourage politicians to do things right. The Ecologenia Movement is today and always the only alternative for that to happen.
The industry calls – since politicians do not do so with more emphasis, let alone economists – that technologists solve the problem of contamiNation that large factories currently generate. We will let the technology experts talk about this, but in relation to soil release, we will say that many of the ecological problems caused by the industry would be solved much easier. One reason is that consumption of many things that cannot occur in cities would fall, but can occur on a piece of land. Education for the use of mini-foundations and small land will be a vital issue later on, but certainly many home industries will emerge, under the Ecologenist Program, allowing a relief from the current industrial saturation.
This does not necessarily mean a loss for the industrial market, but will force it to revise guidelines, to improve qualities to compete with home production and small businesses, to present real ecological advantages in order to function. Industries in the near future should focus on simplifying and improving the quality of rural life, rather than fueling pollution from large cities and litter production. Although this may sound utopian, the reality is that we have no choice. We improve everything despite market trends, or destroy the planet and the human species with it. All environmentalists’ efforts are not worth anything if the key points are not resolved and background solutions are given. Patches that try to put NGNs on are getting less and less. In addition, some, like Greenpeace, are funded and led by the same slavers to make them believe that “there are already people taking care of that…” He has never put the aforementioned NGO, a complaint about chemtrails…
The release of soil under the guidelines expressed in Part Two, is one of these substantive solutions, it is a key to reviving the economy through the construction, small-scale enterprises, the home industry and the development and improvement of the renewable energy industries. The serious problem of unemployment would disappear in a very short time with this application. It is also true that these energies (wind, photovoltaic, etc.) require pollutants, such as batteries, but their recycling and handling are easily controllable, achievable at low costs and is by no means as dangerous as transformers on city streets or the dangers of nuclear waste, from which a single accident can leave life (or worse )or worse , by genetic mutations) to vast territories. On the other hand, we can be honest with the current realities to understand that a nuclear plant is an atomic bomb that a likely enemy or a madman should only detonate, without the need to transport…
ENERGY AND ECOLOGY
A century ago Nicola Tesla developed the science of electricity like no one before and like very few and secretly so far. But he was not the only one who brought to science wonders that we do not enjoy today, thanks to the mafias of global political-economic power, who see in a drastic change in energy extraction systems, nothing more and nothing less than a change of hands of their power. An example that had to shake the foundations of the Sect of the New World Order, was the case of the Spaniard Arturo Estévez Varela, who demonstrated in hundreds of towns and before notary, who was riding a motorbike and then with a motor car on water in late 1973 (he actually used water and a mixture with boron to produce hydrogen) although so did a Uruguayan in Argentina in 1957 and others that were then nothing more than Knew. The economic cost of such an application would be about one hundred times lower than petroleum derivatives, but would also imply a zero emission of pollutants.
News and conversations among Internet experts can also be seen today, but oil multinationals are determined to preserve their hegemony. If we look thoroughly at the energy problem, if we consult with dozens of engineers and then with experts in various related areas, but on the economic side, we will see that we do not live in a true Paradise Earthly because a few lords retain their power over the world, through the brake of all development that can take away their energy monopoly. True, the global pharmaceutical industry w boasts ultra-fast allopathy, radio and chemotherapy, but the most crucial human problem is demographics, money and energy. An economic and technological change that changes the distribution of power and the current use of resources would end the demographic problem, enabling the planet to live ten times more people than now, but without destroying it.
Overpopulation under market guidelines has made all resources scarce, depleting fossils and minerals, as well as some renewables, and threatening to saturate the world and destroy its entire biosystem. But much of the ecological problems are solved when people live on their land rather than multi-story “horizontal construction” or multi-story (a linguistic aberration, because it actually becomes “vertical”). The occupation of large land promotes the production of homemade orchard, fruit trees, farm and countless homemade products that ensure the survival of people in various circumstances such as wars, economic crises, environmental changes and others. In small and diversified high industrial production regions with agricultural environment, countless ecological and economic benefits will be generated. One of the most interesting current factors, thanks to modern technologies, is the possibility that each roof or a few meters of terraces will be occupied in windmills (Savonius type) or solar panels, either for home production or for sale to the grid. It will also be a major boost for companies that manufacture organic matter recycling chambers, methane extraction (biogas) and from that we can expect technical improvements that make greater use of decaying organic matter such as fertilizer or fuel, without falling into one of the worst aberrations on the market: Biofuels such as biodiesel threaten to transform food production fields into fields of raw material for gasoil , as polluting as that extracted from oil despite misinformation by all means. The worst will be the impact on the economy and its impact on the world’s already damaged ability to produce healthy food.
THE WATER ENGINE:
With or without patents, it must be disseminated around the world and to do so, technicians and engineers who develop it – they will no longer be the first or the only ones – must take into account that such advancement cannot be “commercial”, they must spread the plans free of charge, without expecting a particular benefit, unless they are dedicated to manufacturing and selling them themselves , one at a time, by word-of-mouth advertising. Attempting to patent and sell such technology in the usual system is stupid because no major investor will bet against anything that undermines the system’s most powerful economic interests.
Many technicians argue, in their grid mindsets, that producing hydrogen demands more energy than it then yields. That has been proven to be false, since several car companies have launched their prototypes, just as electrolysis is not the only way to do so. German designers during the last year of World War II, figured out how to separate hydrogen from oxygen at virtually no energy cost. The keys are to pass distilled water through a system of capillary ducts (very fine), affected with a series of magnets, separating oxygen from hydrogen, as well as producing it as Arturo Estévez and others did in Spain, with water and a reactive mineral mixture.
Unfortunately the news came to us forty years later, with no plans or more details than the historical ones, but creative engineers won’t take long (and surely some have) to make that separation without electrolysis. This issue has made many people “disappear” and many others will disappear if they try, once the system is discovered or developed, to patent or “sell” it as an industrial project to large investors. The only way to do this without persecution is to quietly build and sell only by reference, starting with friends. This is how many things are spreading that will improve the world if it is not ended by a third world war, or even after there is (if any remaining).
TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE FIELD:
Wood burning today is called “energy through biomass”, a euphemism that is simply simple and simply “burning wood”. Soil release can contribute to a circumstantial need for wood burning, but companies engaged in geothermal and thermosolar technology, with decades of proven efficiency and high ecological and economic benefit in Canada, usa and Europe (especially in Norway, Finland and Sweden), have a moral responsibility to become strong and impose their products at an accelerated rate.
Plants from generally hybrid transgenic seeds can re-give normal seeds by pollination with their own spice and with others. Nature has a myriad of resources, many of which are found in simple techniques that farmers have a responsibility to recover and also has the responsibility to implement an agricultural science called biodynamic agriculture, developed by Rudolf Steiner. Although it may seem like a mixture of applied astrology, the truth is that its results scientifically proven by utterly skeptical agricultural engineers of astrology, are undeniable, resoundingly accurate and easy to apply.
ELECTRICAL NETWORKS:
Nicolas Tesla developed a system by which electricity can be transmitted by Hertzian waves. So we won’t need the wiring to transport it, but thanks to the bankers who made things easier for the well-known pioneers of electricity, the unbreakable, energy-efficient lamps of Tesla and its Hertzian system were left unkified. Why, very simple: There was no way to control the use of each receiver, there would be no way to charge it. So it did not serve for a market system that was already well founded, with powerful managers with energy called “money” in their hands and with oil also booming, for whose commercialization was already being established and programming private and state wars. If civilization overcomes today’s challenges and survives itself, in a few decades we will use electricity free of charge and without wires that soil the landscape. At most, we will have to support wind generators, which many environmentalists denote, as if they could give a better alternative to nuclear power plants. But that wind will be Savonius type, vertical axis, with the design that the Author has already made available to everyone on the web. Those of us who prefer to see a wind farm in a field rather than a radioactive erial such as Chernobyl also say that agricultural compatibility should be sought so that these fields have other utilities. With the Savonius model there are neither the risks of blade drop nor environmental deterioration. On the other hand, while Hertzian electric wave transfer technology is not released (which a few decades ago was taught in correspondence courses and many engineers know), at least high, medium and low voltage telephone lines and electric lines should be piped using road works, etc..
HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL VALUES
Historical and archaeological values must be taken care of as much as possible, but it is unfair that such care is done at the expense of people who have managed to own land by purchase or inheritance. Until the eco-gene plan is fully fulfilled in its political part, landowners must be able to use them rationally. In many cases the discovery of archaeological sites causes so much economic damage to homeowners or landowners that they are rarely wanted to be denounced. This results in the definitive loss of a large number of these values that it is about defending with laws, rather than with education and common sense. The problem comes when the state begins to “defend the common good” with legal-coercive criteria rather than with education and respect for Private Property. Thus the State appropriates the other;’ that is, it expropriates “interesting for the sciences or the arts” assets. This is not the first step in laying the foundations for a genuine state tyranny over private property, but it is the boldest and most damaging, since it triggers a long queue of laws, which needs to be cut “for the healthy,” with a single law of truth, that defends first and foremost the right of the LandOwner, letting it work in this as in all other aspects of the Nation , “market regulation”, whether we like it or not, will always be fairer and less harmful to individuals and the public good, than the pseudo-democratic preaching of the state, with moneycratic applications for everything, but with the application of communist laws on private property.
It is rare to find a peasant who does not know that denouncing a historical or archaeological find will represent the total crippling of his property, an economic loss and in some cases we have known of threats of penalties for destruction of “cultural heritage” when a labrador has broken some archaeological piece as he passed with the plow in his field, as he had been doing for years , in the same place as his father and grandfather did. Is this labrador an “ignorant” who can’t tell a cow bone from a femur from an extinct hominin and guilty of lacking an X-ray view? The truth is that if some archaeological remains or whatever do not belong to the owner of the land, it is not so owner. Let’s say that the state “allows you to use it under strict regulations”… Thus, in addition to not always being able to produce some benefit to it and you must pay a rent to the state, true master and lord in practice, under the title of “taxes”, you risk running out of your land by the law of Forced Expropriation. The worst thing is that whatever the value of what has been found on its land, does not belong to it and will not be considered capital gains for it in an expropriation. The same can be said for any terrain, not just the rustic one. In some U.S. states and England, the Law is fairer.
The repressive and damaging policy for owners ends up being of enormous harm to the care of those values that are intended to be protected as a sacred thing. If these pieces are so valuable, why aren’t the landowner paid properly? It is true that in rare cases the State has taken over the land, paying compensation for expropriation, but they disable for any use to the owner. Most of the compensation – which has been exceptional – has also been little more than alms for owners who have run out of their property. Compensation can usually be charged by large, costly companies (especially if they have contracts with the state or a friend or kinship with politicians) while the owner of a land, the owner of a field or a house without a “plug”, could not even think of facing trials with the State, which instead of defending and protecting it , makes him a victim of the “historic” bad luck of finding a site for the enjoyment of passionate archaeologists, to whom his passion makes nothing of the harm that he causes, as if knowing more of the past would allow them to serve as something to the current problems.
Orthodox archaeology has not even been able to recover for social use the old technologies, the old medicine or anything that serves to improve the present, so that if you find something that could be in the range of “interesting finding” the owner thinks very well before opening the mouth and usually, if properly reported , decides to shut up and there have even been many cases of total destruction of historical values, faced with the risk of losing even more the character of “owner” of the land.
If you really want to preserve historical and archaeological values, the laws must be changed, the owner and the one who makes the find and reward him with profits, not losses. Also, if we look more deeply (never better said), we should remove all European territory, rummaging under the foundations of each house and until the last bank, because in ten millennia of history it is rare that there is a place where man has left no traces, constructions, bonfires, tools, bones… And so much sacramentation of historical and archaeological values… For what? So that the world can continue to believe the aberrant Hollywood stories and aberrations of official history. The criterion set by laws on what is in the “public interest” often does not actually happen in the interest of a few. While the real “public interest” is that owners – the vast majority of citizens – are not harmed. In some countries the state expropriates and endorses the owner’s expert expenses. The expropriate will not hesitate to sell a treasure found at any price on the black market, rather than denounce it to the state, which will pay late and bad land, or will never pay it, but never the other values requisitioned How much are the bones or eggs of a dinosaur worth?: Between 12,000 and 25,000 Euros on the black market, where more are these pieces circulating. If you want to avoid this clandestine circulation for the “common good”, pay the owner for such pieces.
Interestingly, the expropriation law in most European and American countries does not give jurisdiction to the judiciary to tax compensation, unless no agreement is reached with the owner. This requires a trial after many formalities and costs borne by the affected party. First he pays experts, then he has to pay lawyers. Moreover, the “justifiability” of forced expropriations does not contemplate future plan losses, nor does it talk about cases in which a work has already begun (many cases are so, because discoveries are made when digging for foundation).
CONCLUSION: It is not a question of deporting all the protection of historical and archaeological property, nor of discouraging such care, but of modifying the law drastically so that it does not result to the detriment of the owners, so that the criterion of importance is not exceeded and, ultimately, it would be fair that each owner, conscientiously, be advised by the State (neither repressed nor expropriated) to decide himself how important the archaeological find is to the community. After that, deciding whether what the State will pay you for your property – and for the historical and/or archaeological material that belongs to you – deserves the preservation of what has been found or if it compensates you later to carry forward your life plans here and now on your land. That way, certainly many discoveries would no longer be quickly covered, destroyed or sold on the black market and we could appreciate them in museums. Under the current conditions of the law, far from being in a democracy where private property exists, we are under an “archaeo-nessship,” to the rejoicing of a few academics.
POLITICAL-MILITARY STRATEGY
Soil liberalization – population distribution and resources – nuclear energy
“No one wants to think about war, until, because you don’t do it in time, you have to eat a slug in a trench”
One of the most regrettable strategic mistakes (actually well induced by sinarchy in the military) is poor demographic distribution. This is not always remarkable even in the historical perspective – unless carefully analyzed – and goes unnoticed completely for the people. Some military people know this very well, but that strategic factor is complex and they cannot speak without being prosecuted by a military court. True, no one wants to think about war and we say “it can’t happen here, I’m sure nothing’s going to happen.” That has been the thought of all the citizens of the world, except a few connoisseurs, until the day before they were in the midst of a war. Watching every day the news should be didactic, but it numbs us. We believe that everything “goes very far” and that “here will never pass”, without understanding that the interests that move the world do not matter where they have to put up a war to get what they want.
In addition to affecting the present and in times of peace, low population dispersion makes nations more vulnerable at all times and reaches the extreme of disaster in times of war. It is of great interest to strategists and in fact the issue is dealt with in war schools as of fundamental importance. If they do the military around the world, why not analyze a little between simple owners and citizens in general?
It is much easier, cheaper and more effective to take over a large city than a community whose members are scattered, tens or hundreds of meters away. Similarly, we must consider that a scattered community is much more likely to survive any attack and defend itself, as well as less chance of suffering the consequences of a bombardment or any action of destruction or control of an enemy. The logistics of an invader becomes more difficult, hundreds of times more expensive and vulnerable in the countryside than in a city.
While “guerrilla warfare” can be better done in a city to defend itself against armies, according to the views of some strategists, today the force majeure is in bombs, in remote-controlled missiles and endless new weapons and not in armies. Both bombs, missiles and new weapons require more time and numbers to gain some power in the countryside, while being devastating at “low cost” in cities. That is to say that the fear of loneliness and isolation that many people feel, makes them behave like fish that seek to be piled up, as in a shoal, which causes them to fall in greater quantity and at lower costs in the fish nets.
On the other hand, current communications (mobile phones, radios, television, the internet and the current great improvement that are the Wi-Fi networks), make viable a much greater coordination of the local defensive forces (the people of peasants turned defending soldiers). During the Cuban Revolution or the attempts at counter-revolution, defense or guerrilla warfare half a century ago, this was well demonstrated. The Cuban Revolution was successful through a popular peasant preparation and was one of the few with such results. A country foresight would now depend less on satellite communications (internet, telephony and television), and more on the old and backwater but almost infallible radio. The possibilities of radio to keep a community in contact, especially long-wave for mountainous areas, gave more victories than ballistic and even logistical superiority in many cases. Current Wi-Fi technology, with some distance adjustments for regional independence, can make communications from small and medium-sized regions difficult to vulnerable, but in large-scale wars radios will continue to have a great advantage.
A larger occupation of the land by its own owners (we are not talking about a communist-style agrarian revolution, but owners’ rights in a democratic country), would allow the state to make a defensive plan with the participation of the highly effective people. One of the problems raised in this regard is that politicians – especially those studying at universities in the USA and the United Kingdom – come out with their heads full of fear to the military in their own country, who “must be kept at bay to avoid harm to democracy.” They do not understand that all they do is maintain mercenary armies, subject to extranational organizations, that when the government of the highly “studied” politicians dis blocks itself from the directives of the great powers, it will be able to do nothing to defend national sovereignty. But those mercenary forces serve to keep his own people at bay.
Moreover, these non-voluntary armies (thanks to the international manipulation of media created by the “conscientious objectors”) are now mercenaries. People who are going to kill or die anywhere in the world for money, with the humanistic pretexts they want to invent. So things, the least we can do in the private sphere, is defend our rights of private property, so we’re sure to change some game guidelines and possibly more and better than we think now.
Someone will say that – for example Brazil, Spain, Argentina or Mexico – it has little chance of being in a war again, so the exposed is worthless. Can anyone assure that Spain would be left out of an invasion attempt by another country? o Would it be sidelined in the event of a global conflict as we are about to star, despite the “party” with which the Olympic Games and football matches or car racing mask political reality? Someone can say that “no one wants a third world war.” We asked: Did anyone of those affected want the war of 1914-1918 and then world war II or the Spanish Civil War? Do people want all the wars there was, there and there will be…? Have you been asked “democratically” if you wanted her and were willing to give up your lives and those of your children…?
Avoiding them would only be possible through a global dissemination of all this information, making it reach everyone, translating it into all languages, putting the Ecology Movement at its world destination, because there are no people who do not want it, even if they do not yet know the name.
POPULATION DISTRIBUTION AND RESOURCES
The existence of a greater agricultural, livestock and farm activity on a small scale, but widely disseminated, ensures population logistics, i.e. its subsistence, independent of the development of war in cities and strategic points. That can only be achieved if every owner can build on their land and do something with it that really redeems them. Soil liberalization in Spain (serve in an exemplary way to other countries, under proportional extrapolation equations), would mean an increase of between 400 and 600 % of horticultural production over a period of two years, i.e. a proportional recovery approximate to the percentage statistical scale of 1976, when Spain exported twice as many foods as it does right now.
In a convulsed world like today, where the most advanced technologies are used more for destruction than to serve man, neglecting the strategic question is a tremendous mistake. Allowing land owners to build, realize and live on it, in addition to all the benefits mentioned, represents an important correction to the lack of strategic-military and demographic forecasting.
NUCLEAR ENERGY
Chernobyl was not the only nuclear accident that has exposed reality; was only the most out of control in its media outreach (in this update we already have The Fukushima experience and knowledge of the Kyshtym accident, in the Ural Mountains, 2,000 Km east of Moscow, which is not on Wikipedia although there are seven others in other countries, when we have a record of 25 disasters) Still today children are still born with all kinds of genetic defects horrific by nuclear radiation , both for the bombs, for “accidents” and by the application of radiation therapy to women. Almost all nuclear power plants have had accidents or times of out of control that, although quickly controlled, have caused damage to the environment and people. But the situation table should be understood with more aspects than the mere “accident”, because:
1) A nuclear power plant is an atomic bomb that a potential enemy or a madman does not need to build or transport. I’d just have to bomb or detonate.
2) No nuclear power plant is well made enough to withstand an earthquake and most of them are in places exposed to the possibility of earthquake.
3) Nuclear waste cannot yet be recycled until it loses its full destructive potential. The half-life of radioactive compounds is several millennia. Continuing to generate and store them, nofar as they are taken, is a Sword of Damocles for us and for generations to come. Or rather: The risk that there are not next generations.
4) It has been proven in many studies that it is nowhere near as “cheap” as we have been told for decades. Both because of the technical costs of its own, and the corruption behind all that monopoly business of very few people in the world. Or do you think it doesn’t all happen politically?
5) It implies total technological dependence on small groups of professionals, much contrary to wind, thermosolar, photovoltaic or hydromotor.
6) Continued development and nuclear production exponentially increases the chance of individual groups (terrorists or mere students) accessing nuclear material and causing disasters.
It should be noted that, according to some studies on tactically fragile areas, they present the Mediterranean as one of the worst. Apart from being covered in its environment of nuclear power plants and landfills, an atomic bomb of about 15 Kilotons (like Hiroshima’ would be covered), detonated on the ocean surface, would be enough to kill some 35 million people with only the resulting tsunami. If the territories were dealt with in another way, diversifying habitat and inland tourism, without saturating the coasts, apart from minimizing the damage of such very likely situations, nuclear competition for electricity production will be significantly reduced, thanks to the increased demand for alternative energies.
THE PROBLEM OF WATER AND OTHER RESOURCES
There are no water resources that can be kept clean and clean for a population that doubles every fifty years despite wars, hunger and even the inoculation of pests, as has been done not only against African peoples since 1950. Either Ecologenia is practiced, as intelligent ecological control of the population explosion, or the powerful will continue to practice massacre and demographic euthanasia, even without solving ecological, forestry, zoo, energy, climate and global water distribution problems. It is not the blame for the people who procreate, but for the system that makes them unconscious consumers.
With regard to water, it is not that it is lacking, but that policies are pursued aimed at monopolizing the resource, through a chain of private companies that covers more than twenty countries as early as 2009. The suprapolitics who manage the world’s world level know very well that things could be arranged for the benefit of all through Ecologenia, but they are not interested, because to do so implies, as we will not tire of repeating, the distribution of power. Water is not only a vital resource, but one more key in the hands of the demented, for the control of the life or death of peoples. Other resources, such as oil, abound, although we will have to stop using it. However, it is curious to see some maneuvers of oil monopolies, such as the tale of “Hell in Kola” (Russian peninsula in eastern Finland). In the ’80s it spread that the biggest oil drilling performed had ended with a dreadful hearing of voices, screams and horrible whining. So they’d run into hell. A montage that still spreads today in order to discourage deep prospecting around the world, because all kinds of resources, minerals, underground seas and other issues that would quickly overturn the delicate balance by monopolies would be discovered.
CONCRETE DEMOGRAPHICS
Every child born is for the current capitalist system:
* One more faithful, a psychic slave for the interests of some religions. It is not so at all because not all religions are slaves, although we cannot talk about any here.
* One more voter for the puppets of pseudo-democracies, although in many countries only a small percentage will reach the voting age.
But…. On the other hand there is ecological reality, despairing as above, because – on an approximate global average – every child born, before reaching the age of twenty:
* You will have consumed about eighty trees in use of paper and derivatives, not counting wood for heating and furniture.
* You will consume five tons of food.
* It will throw 3.5 tons of faecal matter into the water system, so that the bacterial self-management capacity of the ecosystem is saturated, leading to greater microbiological promiscuity that sooner or later generates all kinds of pests.
* You’ll wear about two hundred kilos of clothes, involving about three hundred and fifty kilos of toxic discharges between agrochemicals for fiber production and manufacturing chemicals and chemicals for programmed self-destruction (95% of clothing is chemically treated so that in a calculated time they are undone – an average of two years – while natural fibers of cotton or untreated linen can last between 15 and 20 years with normal use).
* You will also use before 20 years, 400 liters (four hundred) of chemicals for your personal hygiene, cosmetics, etc..
* Consume about 5,000 (five thousand) liters of petroleum derivatives only for your personal mobility, or about 20,000 liters indirectly from a child. In developed countries this amount is fivefold.
If we multiply them by seven billion, we will have a rough idea only of global ecological current. If we duplicate it, the picture becomes impossible because the world cannot contain so many people in its biosphere under current economic patterns, in which the “ecology” of NGNs, is absurd. The only viable alternative to avoiding methodical genocide and total slavery is to overthrow today’s global power, while distributing power in society as we outlined in Part Two, which will not exempt new governments from educating peoples to reduce human reproduction in quantity and improve human reproduction in quality. It should be noted that there are a few countries whose leaders are authentic and go that line, but we will let each one deduce from what he sees, because it is true that “… By their works you will know them”
GLOBAL DECEPTION POLICIES
The courteous view and lack of human character of these “geniuses” of economics and global politics, has led them to create a system where cunning frightens and applied intelligence in some cases, but that will ultimately mean the slumped fall of the whole civilization. The axiom that the parasite kills the host becomes visible once again. To begin to understand the reality of today’s humanity and how far we can reorient it, we must not only think about saving endangered forests and species. We must start thinking and working on substantive solutions, not merely form. To do this, although it seems like something that has nothing to do with it, we must understand that democracy does not exist and what we have explained enough. Therefore, there will be no substantive solutions from politicians who supposedly represent it. Moneycracy will give us no solution because the solutions involve the absolute loss of the global power of the eighteen families that control global money. Its “solution” is the direct extermination of one billion people and the selective extermination in America and Europe of an unknown number of people. China, as has been seen in recent years, has surrendered to Western interests. Its nearly 1.4 billion inhabitants are increasingly difficult to govern under market rules, incompatible with the traditional way of life of this wise and dignified people. So it has joined the collective genocide, its skies (chemtrails, which were never seen before) have begun to fumigate and are forced to vaccinate both themselves and foreigners. At the time of writing these lines, the “coronavirus” camps on the news. We don’t know yet if it’s real or it’s the repeated campaign of “bird flu,” swine flu, Ebola and so many other lies to sell drugs… did you know that three hundred thousand people die every year from common flu and no one found a vaccine in the world? Only those who sleep in pyramids are safe from that scourge. And there are still people who think that the Author, I say it “to sell pyramids”, without realizing that if I did, I would not write this book that puts me in the crosshairs of all the weapons of the slave sinarchy.
The few politicians with some sense and ideals, spend all their energy to reach power and once they reach it, depending on their situation, they find out who actually commands. Maybe someone will ever tell them things by the clear, but they usually have to realize themselves, when pressures and corruption begin. Then they find out which country they have to visit before others… If they don’t get on the car of moneycracy, they are simply boycotted, thrown like dogs with a revolt (very common in South America, like the recent one against Evo Morales in Bolivia), a scandal (Clinton-style) or a good war as it was with Saddam Hussein, who in addition to scaring, leaves “example” and secures a good percentage of profit to Western oil companies , brings royal benefits to the arms industry, which, being one of the strongest in concentrated capitals (lobbies), gives some respite to the economy of some First World countries.
The common citizen believes that he /chooses” by voting for a candidate. Very rarely is there any that the lords of Global Economic Sinarchy do not have under their wing and approval. If he wins that and does not accept the role of “privileged employee” offered to him to remain “in the concert of nations,” he is soon put on a worldwide press campaign by dictator, terrorist, demagogue, populist, pro-Nazi and all possible qualifiers. It is often passed to the GDM (Global Military Policy), with a war.
GLOBAL MILITARY POLICY
The candidate of any truly honest political movement that wants to change things and truly improve his country, must consider that he faces the international powers of money, technological monopoly and the intelligence of Global Military Policy, whose secret services are fuzzy, with great experts in infiltration, huge in numbers of agents and who have unlimited economic means and technological advances that have not been sold to any country. No state, military or civilian intelligence service has the effectiveness of these true international intelligence services, even if we are presented to cia or FBI sloppy travelers as the most in matters of espionage, manipulation, investigation, etc.
To keep at bay any attempt at an uprising against the system, self-management or implementation of humanitarian policies that could free countries from the yoke of moneycracy, the first ruse being put into practice is the polarization of the people. If Juancito is the “genius of politics” to overthrow, an anti-Jewishness is mounted, but several lines of “juancists” are also mounted, with small or large differences between them, but sufficient to divide the energy of the leader’s movement and neutralize it for inconsistency of its own purpose and methods.
They put on “juancists” candidates infiltrated in all the ranks, who will do everything to dissolve the cohesion force of the party or movement that has brought John to power. If the leader is too charismatic and intelligent and survives that first strategy, he will seek to strengthen anti-Jewishism until he brings the country to a civil war, appealing to all small, medium or large historical, religious and any order differences that can turn the Nation into a war chess board, or is divided into two or more sides. Insured massacre if successful, especially if a civil war is achieved as in Spain, or now in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The Global Military Policy uses the military structure and intelligence services of some countries absolutely subjected to Globalist Sinarchy to develop, manage and operate scalar weapons. One thing that should worry environmentalists more and make them investigate thoroughly, is the issue of “chemtrails” or chemical wakes, produced by certain aircraft, which for an attentive observer have nothing to do with the “contrails” that leave almost all commercial aircraft on some occasions but do not persist in the air. In this regard there are several websites with abundant photographs and information. One part of this fumigation – the largest – is intended for the dispersion of pathogenic biological material, but another not only contributes to that barbarity, but with atomized metals the atmosphere is densified to optimize the result of high frequency pulse cannons (HAARPs). They have “antenna shape, ” but they’re that, electromagnetic cannons.
IMMEDIATE SOLUTIONS
There are local and global solutions, but it must be understood that the above is the visible manifestation of the problem (although, as well and all, only a few are able to see it) Therefore it is urgent to understand the general perspective, which presents three main actions:
1.- Mental break with the system, even if you continue to work and live “normally” for individual survival.
2.- Modification of the system by action of the human mass, ensuring global survival in Assemblies.
3.- Purification and development of consciousness, individual and group, fundamental factor to improve both perspectives. Without it, neither individual survival nor correction for a global survival of Humanity will be possible.
In the first question, that of individual survival, thousands of people have prepared anti-radioactive bunkers, special courses are made, we live in fear, we seek to recover ecological cultivation, recover simplified technology from the past two centuries, which allow with a minimum of resources to obtain electricity, make metals, build houses, manufacture tissues and all kinds of things that would be missing almost immediately once the global system fell by natural disasters , for wars or for the entropy of the financial system.
That’s all very well, except for living in fear. The psychology of the survivor must be free of that and all emotional scourges. In fact, the most difficult problems to overcome are within each individual. This is the distorted psychological structure of the vast majority of people, which would make the coexistence of large or small groups of survivors unbearable. Therefore, the first solution – or at least the first question to be solved – is within each one, assuming reality rather than fleeing it, but from now on. It makes no sense to wait for the disastrous vaticiniums of many scientists, not by pessimists, or because they are also pregone by the “enlightened and mystical”, they are no longer realistic and of obvious occurrence right now. Transcendental Psychology is part of this solution, which, since it is not suitable for the market, is not taught in schools as just over a century ago. His postulates, already enunciated in the classical education philosophy of Greeks, Romans and Egyptians, are not easy to find in libraries, however, we will be able to see in the aforementioned books, the keys to this issue, which allow the individual to prepare psychologically to face the present and the future under any circumstances. The book Catarsis Cátara has been published after the first edition of Ecologenia, to instruct all audiences on this fundamental issue.
The second point is the least understood by honest politicians and genuine ideals. In order to implement a real solution, modify the system and achieve global survival, there are a number of urgent measures that cannot be taken in a single country. They must stand firm in these actions, all peoples who understand the problem, their rights and alternatives.
The measures at the individual level are:
1. Do not be vaccinated or allow compulsory vaccination. If possible, discourage all vaccination.
Each one in their community must be achieved through legal action (before courts) that, taking into account what is known and fed up with the knowledge of scientists on social media, the harmful effects of vaccines and now the greatest risk due to the existence of nanotechnology, are prohibited. The Judges have the power to do so and they need to be appealed. All other action is useless and even counterproductive:
1-a.- Mass demonstrations only serve the powerful and their political puppets to “press” reactions, produce a huge expense of personal energy and time; one or two trained agents is enough to break the demonstration and turn it into violent episodes. When it is really appropriate to do so, the peoples must be organized, with military knowledge, forming their own teams to neutralize the violent, so that the police do not have to intervene.
1-b.- The collection of manual signatures online is useless. They reach the powerful without any legal effect. They are used to add trademarks to signers in their databases and to expand their statistics.
2. Prosecuting vaccines and fumigation or any other operation that violates citizens’ rights. There is no place for the absurd objection that they are “steam slaes”, when there is countless material evidence of the difference between steam slaes and chemical slaes. The falsehood of democracy in the general context and legislative aberration does not take away from the judicial power having material resources and being a power as legitimate as it is effective. It is very important to ask each judge to take the cases without transfer to other courts and not to allow all similar courts to be unified in a single court or prosecutor’s office, or ombudsmans, even if these entities may do separately what is competent for them.
Let no politician take away from a judge his attributes, when it is he and only he who has them to protect the citizens of his district or constituency. If the cases are unified and they refer to a general prosecutor’s office, it will be enough for the powerful to attack or replace a single prosecutor and everything will be lost. No international standard has in this globalist market policy farce, no ethical or legal value, and this has been demonstrated countless times. For the Judges to interconsult, in the face of massive causes to stay informed and share ideas, will be fine, but if they formed a specific association, it would be like unifying the causes: They would lose their individual judgment and power, giving an association a unifying power, easy to politicize and to infiltrate for the benefit of the criminals they have to judge.
3. Money is the main weapon of the “powerful.” They have only managed to be powerful at the mercy of that instrument. They are not Warriors willing to be in charge of the troops, to wrap thesempt in the dust of battle, nor are they mixed with “the plebs”. No, they live in the “media shadow”, they are hard and cruel when young people, in the universities where they form lodges and learn what is necessary to replace those who are already carcamans. But though cunning and cruel, they are nothing more than a bunch of degenerates, with minds stunted by the education received. Just as peoples are educated in the “poor mindset,” distorting the Doc-Trina taught by the great Masters, they are instilled in the “mentality of the rich and powerful.” None has been able to make their conscience prevail over the monstrous dictates of an education of slavers. None has been able to make their healthy children’s ideals prevail, the values of their own Soul or their own true Dignity, over the monstrous instilled idea of being “chosen”, either by a supposed god or by his clan.
As soon as the world ceases to live under usury, which must be done in steps, first eliminating private banking in each country, nationalizing banks and declaring itself “bankrupt” with respect to “external debts,” just as companies large or small do, following even the same “market laws,” the power of the “powerful” will be mere shadow. It will not be easy for any country alone, but there are already countries that are in the process of abolishing usury, where multinationals cannot continue to steal resources by paying prebends to bought rulers, nor can they keep the people enslaved. These rulers (such as Morales in Bolivia or Correa in Ecuador, for example) are demonized by international media, made the poor have access to free medicine and good as an inalienable right, that they can send their children to universities, that they have decent housing without paying a salary every month for life. These demonized rulers are making their countries have no work stoppages. Their “socialism” is not about paying the rags for not working, but to make work not lack, that progress and employment do not depend on a multinational company seeking cheap labor. They made their own state-owned enterprises, such as those that led to power to almost every country technified. Some like them are making money just an instrument in the hands of the state, rather than in the hands of Wall Street speculators. The various bags of the world ultimately respond in their game to the convenience of that small group of cunning “powerful” who have turned the money they control, into a dreadful drug in the social body of the world.
The rulers demonized by the “ultra-right,” are only pulling their countries out of that “globalizing” trap, making a first step a “state capitalism,” controlling them rather than the usurers. Minting currency and printing own banknotes, instead of buying them from foreign printers at the price of “money”. Unsurprisingly, money-cratic governments not only campaign against the inside, but also by demonizing them in the face of public opinion in neighboring countries.
These rulers demonized for using their own money without usury, who without losing their leadership maintain an Assembly system, are the ones who are doing in practice, which can become Ecologenia, if they understand it both poor and rich right now. In this globalized world we seek to break all differences, it is intended that Blacks be Aryans and the Aryans be Black, that the Yellows are Aryans and the Blacks are Hindus. In an Ecologenic world everyone should be whatever and however they want, as long as they don’t harm others. And for that you must educate yourself, not force with laws. But there will not be that “obsession with equality,” but the one and greatest difference that this market system sustains must be broken and which is the most laudable of all: Rich and Poor. Demonized by the money, they’re doing it. And not by making the rich less rich, but by making the poor man richer.
It is now up to us, the citizens of all countries, to follow their example and to widen the gap they have opened against the New World Order earth. We Ecologists have to do that “New World Order”, but with guidelines totally opposed to the pergeña by the megracriminals of moneycraxy. We don’t want to live in a “united world” under the guidelines of usury. We want to live in a respectful world, where each nation retains its own values, its own languages, its own customs and whether they must be modified because they contain social pathologies and involve suffering, are transmuted by the effect of comparison and education, not by the effect of a thousand repressive laws, let alone serve as a pretext for military invasions.
People can survive anything if they are supportive. In that case, the practical power of the people is to refuse to pay taxes and/or services, so that political puppets and senior business holding companies will be in distress and cannot force a conscious and united mass. In some cases, Ecologists will have to use the judiciary to give concrete judgments against abuses by companies providing services, or against the people of politicians, despite the immunities that have been self-adjudicated. But that requires every citizen to become aware and use laws with a communal sense, not just to claim for personal nonsense, as is the case in the vast majority of judgments.